In that same period, Bartkus’ rhetoric on alternative social media sites was dark. “I would not acknowledge reproduction as a human right, but instead as a form of rape,” IndictEvolution wrote on Lemmy.World in July 2023. “I am also not bothered by infanticide as long as it is done humanely…”

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    24 hours ago

    He was much more active, and posted on the .world antinatalist fourm. The admins have removed posts/comments 3 days ago before the headlines rolled out.

    If you check what a few members have posted (I’ll try to gather what I can, I hate people who say something and then go "well google you dingus, and I hate being a hypocrite even more), he was active for a while beyond those 2 years, telling people some horrid shit.

    I genuinely will try to gather what I can whenever I put on my biohazard suit and check some instances.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The admins have removed posts/comments 3 days ago before the headlines rolled out.

      You sure? Usually, removed posts & comments still show up on their profile; they just say “removed” instead of seeing the actual text of it. Unless it was physically removed from the database, there would be some evidence of it. And even the database method wouldn’t federate, I’m pretty sure, so you’d still be able to see it if you looked in other instances. On no instance that I checked was I able to find any evidence the user made any submissions after 23 July, 2023.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I probably will, I would rather give sources that prove me wrong than be one of those dipshits who go “Um googling is free, expecting me to give sources for things I’m saying is asking too much of me. Please ignore that people who made claims are the ones who are expected to prove it, instead of the other way around.”