The reason cited by the mods is misinformation. Not supporting violence, or any other reason. Saying that Luigi isn’t the shooter is considered misinformation and trolling.
In America, the law is innocent until proven guilty. But on lemmy.world, the rule is guilty until proven innocent, and anyone saying the accused is innocent is a troll.
You, once again, argue in bad faith. Honestly, at this point I’m with all the other people who accuse you of being a troll.
Just because he’s not yet convicted does not mean it isn’t clear that he’s the murderer. You could say he’s innocent based on the evidence we had shortly after with the two mismatching photos, but that was kinda the cops fault for not putting any sort of context to those photos, making them look like they just released photos of two random people. Now though? He got caught basically red handed, with the weapon used in the murder still on him. It’s blindly obvious that it was him, he even admits it in his manifesto. It does not matter if he’s guilty by court, he murdered that guy, it was him, period. You’re just unnecessarily pedantic. Or who else do think shot that asshole? Did they somehow plant the weapon in his bag? Why is he not denying it? Again, you’re arguing in bad faith.
Wtf do you mean he’s not denying it? He’s pleading not guilty and claiming the police planted all of the evidence! How could he deny this any further??
I should’ve used past tense I guess. But yes, he’s making a show out of it now.
Who is making a show here?
Yup, it’s obvious what the truth is, and most people here are arguing in bad faith because pretty much everyone here approves of what he did. Hell, even my rich, staunchly Republican father approves of what he did.
But since people want to be pedantic: