• N-E-N
    link
    fedilink
    English
    277 months ago

    Why this many people use Snapchat is incomprehensible

    There are so many good messenger apps and all of them, Snapchat’s giant userbase remains

    • @camr_on@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      I really hate it but I still have active group chats that I haven’t had luck getting elsewhere. I get the impression it’s the same for most people because I haven’t heard anyone say anything positive about it in years

    • @Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      Hell, why do this many people use LinkedIn? The whole platform was built off of scraping Windows user’s address books without permission, sending unsolicited emails to all of those contacts using the name of that user, and pretending like they were such a great platform that of course your friends are inviting you to also join. And I’m pretty sure they still use this practice today because I continue to get emails from people who have no idea why their name is being attached to the spam I receive.

      • JJROKCZ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        I’m in IT management at my company, the general management and HR folks basically require anyone in a leadership position to have a filled out LinkedIn profile with it linked to your Office account so it shows up in your outlook card and linked in your signature. So we look “professional and tech-driven” since all social media is lumped in with the tech industry for some reason

      • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        LinkedIn is very useful for job searching and networking. I don’t post on there, but it was key to getting several job offers.

        I’m not aware of any other professional social networks.

        • @Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          I guess it just annoys me that they built a product on incredibly shady practices and have somehow managed to wedge themselves in to the business world under the guise of being “legitimate”. Trusting anything on their site, to me, feels as risky as trusting anything you see on Yelp – sure a real person might have posted the review, or maybe the business paid their blackmail tax to not get de-listed, but how many better opportunities are not being shown because the company deleted all their positive reviews?

          • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 months ago

            I mean, sure, it’s not good if they did sketchy stuff to bootstrap their network. I hadn’t heard there before but I wouldn’t be surprised.

            But I don’t think it’s really the same as Yelp. Or at least not how I use it. Trust isn’t really a factor. I don’t use LinkedIn to review a company. I don’t look at their soulless posts about how great their team is. I use it to see “do I know anyone who works at this place that has an opening I want?” Then when I see my old friend is a manager there, I shoot him a message (possibly not even via LinkedIn if it’s someone I know well) and ask if it’s someplace I would want to work at. There’s not really a lot of room for fake in that process.

            Also sometimes recruiters just message me. Some of them suck but that’s not really particular to LinkedIn.

            You’re not thinking of Glassdoor, are you? Because that’s more like yelp and I don’t especially trust the positive reviews on there.

            I don’t really want to go to bat for Microsoft though. I’d be happier if there was a better professional network out there. But, you know, capitalist hellscape.

      • @makunamatata@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 months ago

        LinkedIn is a “need” for the ones wanting a job and trying to tell their new job /company is the best. Once these needs are satisfied they forget about it and only come back when the need arises again.

      • @Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        Don’t know why you got downvoted. There is absolutely an “age” component to why people use a certain platform.

        Social platforms have enormous retention leverage also. Once all your friends are there…

        • @makunamatata@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          The age component is absolutely a reason and so is the leverage of the community and friends like you said. No doubt about it. It’s herd mentality and FOMO. Finally it is also how easy to get in and stay sucked in. These other platforms have the dopamine trigger game figured out on their apps. Fediverse doesn’t have that so much, other than the organic “did someone reply to me?” feeling. If you don’t engage then fediverse is not pulling you in.

      • N-E-N
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        Ngl FB Messenger is way better than Snapchat.

        I don’t like Meta but at least the app feels like it isn’t making its users even more ADHD by the minute

    • @tmsbrdrs2@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      I use it for the same reason I use anything, the people I talk with are there. I already drew a hard line in the sand with some devices and Windows.

      • N-E-N
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        Snapchat is a line I drew. It’s probably my single least favourite messaging option

    • GladiusB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      I’m surprised it’s considered social media. I only go there looking for work. Sure there are some posts that are social. But seems mostly geared to getting jobs and networking from a business perspective.

      • Strit
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        I’d argue that Twitch and Youtube are less a social media than LinkedIn. Twitch/Youtube is video streaming with interactive chat. That’s it.

        That’s just my definition though. Yours may vary.

        • GladiusB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          I see your point. The difference for me is the substance of the content. If the site was geared towards just something it’s just a website. But it having content about anything makes it kind of social to me. I hear you though. I see where many of these don’t fit into social media.

  • @jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    147 months ago

    I like to imagine a little escape pod coming out of the Reddit bubble and drifting in to the Lemmy dot representing my migration.

  • @the_third@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    57 months ago

    Yes. Now, if we could implement an irl place without all those people as well, I think I’d like that. Everything contains idiots but I find the overall company around here at least somewhat filtered of them.

    • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      I think the people here tend to filter themselves better than places like reddit.

      Having left somewhere else, they don’t want the new place to suffer the same fate.

  • @spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    237 months ago

    ‘LinkedIn’

    LinkedIn is as much Social Media as talking with your manager is Socializing.

    It’s really plastic and fake feeling there, more so than anywhere else.

  • @Naz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    177 months ago

    Haha, now show us a map of the size of different stars compared to Sol (ours, in the local solar system).

    Sometimes the small stars and communites are the most important. ;)

    • @logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      97 months ago

      If you’ve been to Reddit since the API meltdown, it’s pretty clear that large sections of it were fucked by angry moderators, and still remain that way. I don’t think the fediverse was ready to take over, but Reddit very clearly has fewer people working for them for free.

      Specifically, there are several subreddits where they used to be strict about submissions, and now they let anything mildly related in.

      I’m honestly pretty surprised that they still haven’t recovered. At this point, I’m hoping that their mediocrity will continue to push people away until Lemmy can catch up.

      • Aurelius
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        I think the struggle is that we still need to build more tools for the fediverse ecosystem. I’ve been building Lemmy frontends but it’s a big lift to make a world class experience for users, moderators, instance owners, etc.

        Progress is being made, but I agree that Lemmy was not prepped for the wave of Reddit users.

    • u/unhappy_grapefruit_2
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      With the way this graph is looking spez is pounding your ass to the bone and is about to give you an aneurysm. fuck spez has been given an entirely new meaning

      • Not really. Here’s some statistics from reddit itself.

        If you even have minimal activity, according to reddit recap you’ll be in the top 1% of reddit users for that year. With that one can conclude that reddits true userbase, can not exceed 5 million.

        Reddit in its usercount counts all accounts, including banned ones that have long been replaced by ban evasion accounts. This and the sites old age leads to grossly inflated numbers.

        Want even more damning numbers for reddit? Well the maximum participation for r/Place (read, everyone who even as much as viewed the event. Not even participating.) Was 1.9 million. Considering how intensly it was promoted it is likely people would have clicked on the giant banner notification. That means out of the less than 5 million active users, 3.1 million didn’t even glance at the giant event that has been promoted with massive popups, banners and shiny symbols over the reddit page.

        • u/unhappy_grapefruit_2
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -7
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          1.9 million users is still one hell of a userbase more than lemmy will ever see maybe if some major events happen such as reddits rules getting stricter or mods getting more heavy on the ban hammer then we may see some more users join lemmy

          • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 months ago

            I think you’re selling freedom short, yeah convenience and momentum are hard to beat but Lemmy is where the open source Devs are and the first adopters, I think we’re gonna go see a lot of interesting things emerge here which will draw a lot of users into trying it out - especially if all the other social media sites are closing their doors to people without accounts from viewing information.

            What Lemmy needs is it’s own version of place, not the same thing but things that are fun and novel and community building. The basic stuff is still getting finalized but as things get established we’ll see plenty of tools made to help moderation, to enable new features and useful ways of interacting with information. Hopefully some fun games and toys too.

            I’ve got a lot of work to do on my main project at the moment but I’ve also got a lot of ideas for Lemmy stuff I want to play with when I’ve got the time, I’m sure theres a lot of other people cooking up ideas and watching things develop and stabilize waiting for the right time.

    • @Staiden@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      837 months ago

      I’m absolutely fine with 1.5 million. I enjoy lemmy much more than reddit. I feel like content and conversations here are better. None of the karma farming and corporate promotion disguised as natural content.

        • @SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          147 months ago

          If anything, smaller might be better in this case. We kind of have an idea of the type of demography we have here, with Reddit you could be arguing with a 9-year old in every other thread and you wouldn’t even know.

      • @ericjmorey@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        1.5 million is almost entirely Mastodon users which have no clue how Lemmy’s commenting culture works so rarely contribute in a way that makes sense to both the Mastodon commenter and the Lemmy comenter/poster at the same time.

        Lemmy has ~20k ish actively commenting accounts.

      • lad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        567 months ago

        Although you’re correct, I find fediverse lacking in the department of the more niche stuff, e.g. fandoms of specific games, communities by geo proximity, obscure hobbies.

        But well, Reddit wasn’t like this from the start and I hope the diversity and smaller communities will be here instead of there with time.

        • @Huschke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          While I was also part of some niche communities back in the Reddit days, thanks to Lemmy, I switched to Linux and have found interesting new websites, tools and apps. So I’d say overall it’s a net positive.

        • @triclops6@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          167 months ago

          Former r/fountainpens Reddit refugee here, and I agree 1.5m users doesn’t generate the kind of traffic for my hobby to figure in any sort of way. I miss the engagement

        • JustEnoughDucks
          link
          fedilink
          English
          57 months ago

          Yep, I used to be on r/diyhotas and that was already a niche within the HOTAS niche within the simulator game niche 😂