• Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    Through UCLA’s Technology Transfer Group, which transforms brilliant research into global market products, the scientists have co-founded a medical development company called Pelage Pharmaceuticals

    In case you were curious how this publicly funded research is going to be turned into private profits.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      I don’t think UCLA is going to produce retail products themselves.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        They could always make the research and processes public domain, so no one person can unilaterally profit.

        But that’s not what they did, and that’s the problem.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            48
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            Of course not, which is why they’re publicly funded. That’s the issue. They’re using public funds to make private profits.

              • Telorand@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                26 days ago

                License and release it into the public domain: research, methods, processes, patents—the whole deal.

                Privatizing medicine, even elective medicine, just ensures predation.

                • catloaf@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  I’m not following. Making the results public domain doesn’t prohibit private companies from manufacturing for profit.

  • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    26 days ago

    I started losing my hair when I was a teenager, so I’ve been bald for most of my life. I’ve been shaving my head for decades because it’s the only way my head and face don’t look absurd. I’m totally used to it, and long ago accepted that I’d never have hair on my head again.

    But I’d be lying if I said I didn’t want my hair back.

    If this turns out to be legit and works on most people, there could be a worldwide explosion of self-esteem in adults.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      26 days ago

      As someone that has also been bald since I was a teenager, I’ve also gotten used to it. I’ve accepted my fate and I’m fine with being bald.

      But at the same time do you ever have those dreams where you have hair again and get super excited about it? Like straight up Jesus hair.

      • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        26 days ago

        100%

        I’ve had dreams where my long locks were dramatically blowing in the wind, only to wake up and run my hands through my…well shit, that’s just my scalp.

        • tapdattl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          I just wish I had done something absurd like sport a bright pink mohawk at some point before going bald 😂

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        I had postcard white-guy Jesus hair, hanging to the middle of my back, straight and reddish blond. A beard too. I went bald in my mid-40s and now what’s left around the fringes is white. People who see pictures of me from back in the day don’t recognize me.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    Hair loss is caused by a multitude of factors, including aging, stress, hormonal imbalances and bad genetics.

    “Bad” genetics?! Damn, that’s a little fucking judgmental for what is ultimately just a cosmetic issue.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Better watch out, when the king of the US government is done with all the queers and chronically ill the baldies are next.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      If the topic is undesired head hair loss, “bad” appropriately describes the genes that may contribute to that. The discussion is limited by the context to avoiding hair loss, it isn’t a universal conversation on cosmetics

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Yes if you 100% swallow the cultural requirement to have a full head of hair, then not having one is bad. But I don’t expect a journalist or academician to write from such a culturally specific point of view.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          It’s an article about curing baldness, all context is pre determined.

          Like sure, if we’re just bringing anything up, why care about baldness when I can’t breathe underwater, or if I can’t raise the dead?

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            If scientists came up with a new treatment for multiple sclerosis, and an article mentioned “bad genetics” as one of the reasons people develop MS, that would be shitty, wouldn’t it? How is this different? Obviously in the context of that MS article, it’s “bad” to have MS and we want to cure it. But you wouldn’t shit on people who suffer from it by saying they have “bad genetics.” So how is it any different? It seems just as unnecessary and disrespectful here as it does there.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              I mean if it’s a damaged or failed it’s a bad gene. It caused ms!

              It’s not shitting on a person, it’s discussing a condition.

              I can understand that discussion can lead to eugenics style thoughts.

              “Oh that person has tons of bad genes, they therefore are bad”. That’s wrong though, a person can have a super fucked up body but it doesn’t change their value or goodness.

              When discussing a condition, the genes that improve or cause that condition can be described as good or bad.

              Context matters.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  24 days ago

                  It’s a bad gene. It’s literally the contextually appropriate description of a factor involved in a situation.

                  Sorry it hurts your feelings

                  We’ve both made our points and opinions known here.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      It’s not just cosmetic. Hair keeps the heat from escaping the head so quickly and, more importantly, it helps keep the head from getting sunburned and skin cancer.

  • Allah@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Answer: kind of, as long you keep applying the substance you will regrow all the hair that you have lost and maintain it

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      26 days ago

      That’s the problem I’ve always had with baldness remedies. Shaving my head every other week takes less effort and saves money. Plus I’ve been bald since highschool so I’m kinda used to it at this point.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        26 days ago

        Saves money sure, but every other week? I have to buzz it twice a week to keep it short enough to not look terrible. That’s enough effort that I’d rather apply a regular treatment.

        Not like a daily “keep doing it or you lose all progress” treatment, but maybe like a “use it more or less daily and it’ll grow back” treatment.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      26 days ago

      Hair loss remedies are always criticized on the grounds that you need to continue using them to continue seeing the benefits.

      I don’t know why this complaint surfaces for hair loss medications in particular, when a lot of things are like this. Insulin. Depression drugs. All supplements. Etc.

  • Takashiro@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    26 days ago

    Cool, but if this does work maybe in 10 years it will be easily accessible , Iam already going bald right now, sure it would be nice to have an option down the line.

    One thing to keep in mind growing up in this age, a lot of things being developed or in the news now, simply won’t be accessible or relevant within my lifetime.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Dude, if this upsets you, consider that there are promising signs we may be able to significantly slow or even reverse aging itself within the next 50 years.

      This means that it will have taken humanity 10 or 20 thousand generations, since our origins, to achieve immortality. But you, me, and everyone reading this is going to miss out on that by about 2.

  • FreeSoftware Ganoo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’m bald and started shaving my head as soon as I noticed it was thinning (19 yrs old). I like the lack of maintenance and I think I look good with a bald head. \o/

    Wouldn’t change it tbh.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Sure, but no need for combs, hair product, trips to the barber… I shave my face in the shower, and just keep going.

    • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Hey, I’m glad you can pull it off! I would look really weird with a shaved head. I would think there’s still maintenance involved though. How often do you have to shave it?

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    Finasteride effectively cured male pattern balding already. It’s safe and effective, the only downside is that you need to keep taking it

  • meyotch@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    Can’t speak to the effectiveness of the baldness cure, but the model in the stock photo has cured ED, I am sure.