I think “most” people just believe uncritically the things they were taught growing up, that is until something happens that shakes that belief and they either choose to double down or reexamine their previous assumptions. All the new western tankies from the past decade-ish aren’t coming from nowhere!
Anti-tankies aren’t getting banned because they’re not supporting leftists and Luigi, genius. They’re allowed to stay on Reddit and post NATO propaganda to their heart’s content.
Yes, you’ve attempted to play yourself off as leftist-adjacent to push these topics before. We’ve gotten into back and forths on this multiple times, and every time you’re provided a source that the western talking points you’re pushing are debunked, you repeat the State Dept propaganda verbatim.
Ah yes, your “sources” that are always random websites, blogs and YT videos with 0 legitimacy. And when you do post a primary source it contradicts your point.
Or the time you posted a state department source to support your point and not only did it not, it proved that you only deride against sources as “propaganda” when they’re against you, but when you think they’re for you it’s all hunky dory? Lol
So, it’s either support authoritarianism or your not left? What kinda crap is that?
OP’s referring to when I provided a link from the State Dept admitting they had no evidence of a Uyghur genocide. They also don’t accept non-western sources as legitimate, so demand that you provide a western source to disprove western propaganda.
Thanks for putting on a show for the flood of new users. Way to immediately out yourself to incoming leftists.
Lol the state dept link that said they didn’t have evidence to meet the strictest definition of genocide, but had evidence of gross serious human rights violations of China
True, I think .world does over do it a bit, but I think it’s more just because they’re such a large instance that bad moderation decisions are much more frequent
Unlike .ml, where the mods/admins methods push a clear narrative
Censorship I agree with is still censorship. I’m not a free speech absolutist but I realize that my views are not universal. For example, a Nazi would say I’m pushing the narrative that there is a single human race
I do think .ml is a little too intense, but op is also kinda right about .world imo. Come to dbzero, we’ve got anarchism and piracy
Also we’re all cool and intelligent and attractive.
Obviously
Throw in some cookies and I’d be there.
What about pirated cookbooks with cookie recipes?
Removed by mod
They’re 100% BlueMAGA in my opinion.
Hate to break it to ya, but most people on Reddit are in fact anti-tankie
Also please show me my last post on this because it has been a while lmao
I think “most” people just believe uncritically the things they were taught growing up, that is until something happens that shakes that belief and they either choose to double down or reexamine their previous assumptions. All the new western tankies from the past decade-ish aren’t coming from nowhere!
Anti-tankies aren’t getting banned because they’re not supporting leftists and Luigi, genius. They’re allowed to stay on Reddit and post NATO propaganda to their heart’s content.
Tankie!= Leftists, Tankies = authoritarians
For example, I myself 1000% support Luigi and shit on my gov all the time lmao
But I am absolutely anti-tankie, because I do not support authoritarianism regardless of if it’s the US or China/Russia
Yes, you’ve attempted to play yourself off as leftist-adjacent to push these topics before. We’ve gotten into back and forths on this multiple times, and every time you’re provided a source that the western talking points you’re pushing are debunked, you repeat the State Dept propaganda verbatim.
I think he supports every socialist revolution, except for every one that succeeds.
Here is a slightly better website with the chapter
Ah yes, your “sources” that are always random websites, blogs and YT videos with 0 legitimacy. And when you do post a primary source it contradicts your point.
Or the time you posted a state department source to support your point and not only did it not, it proved that you only deride against sources as “propaganda” when they’re against you, but when you think they’re for you it’s all hunky dory? Lol
So, it’s either support authoritarianism or your not left? What kinda crap is that?
OP’s referring to when I provided a link from the State Dept admitting they had no evidence of a Uyghur genocide. They also don’t accept non-western sources as legitimate, so demand that you provide a western source to disprove western propaganda.
Thanks for putting on a show for the flood of new users. Way to immediately out yourself to incoming leftists.
Lol the state dept link that said they didn’t have evidence to meet the strictest definition of genocide, but had evidence of gross serious human rights violations of China
True, I think .world does over do it a bit, but I think it’s more just because they’re such a large instance that bad moderation decisions are much more frequent
Unlike .ml, where the mods/admins methods push a clear narrative
Censorship I agree with is still censorship. I’m not a free speech absolutist but I realize that my views are not universal. For example, a Nazi would say I’m pushing the narrative that there is a single human race