• Reddit has begun issuing warnings to users to regularly upvote violent content with a view to taking harsher action in future.
  • The company says that it will consider expanding this action to other forms of content in future.
  • Users are concerned that this moderation tactic could be abused or just improperly implemented.
  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Supporting Palestine: violent.
    Supporting Ukraine: violent.
    Suggesting Lemmy: believe or not, violent too

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It is just galling to me that some massive rich dweebs interpreted all of my favorite dystopian cyberpunk as a blueprint

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “Violent” needs scare quotes, because it’s obviously subjective and ripe for abuse.

        • soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          As long as you don’t censor us, which a decentralized Lemmy can’t do in comparison to Reddit.
          The government is way more worrying though.

          Hard to imagine that it was only a few years ago(, before E.Musk bought Twitter,) that we were denying the influence of governments on social media censorship, and said that “private companies aren’t censoring, because they’re not the government, if you don’t like this platform just change/leave”. It has changed and now we’ve quickly accepted that states should enforce (more )laws all over the/our internet. And many don’t see that our fact-checking is unilaterally biased, etc.

          Someone from programming.dev may have heard of the declaration of the independence of cyberspace , among others.

          • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Let me be absolutely clear.

            The opinions and concerns about “censorship”, and just about everything else, from “Whatabout-NATO/'Murica?” apologists and fellators for the CCP, Xi Jingping, Mao, Vladimir Putin, the USSR, Stalin, the DPRK, Che Guevara, Castro, Islamo-totalitarians, drug cartels, and <insertMurderousAuthoritarianTyrantsHere> are worth less than Marx and Engels’ flaming dickcheese.

            They can all pleasure themselves in their own puckered accelerationist bungholes with their Molotov-sippy-cups that they can barely lift out of their premium-outdoor-brand backpacks.

            No matter who’s “side” they claim to be on, never trust anyone who says, “I/We are in charge, forever.” Especially, the angsty edgelords at lemmy.ml.

            • soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 minutes ago

              What they said is that the proletariat is in charge forever, not capitalists/bourgeois/‘the wealthiest’ anymore.

              You can trust our capitalist-owned medias on whether they succeeded or not.

              The problem is that the u.s.s.r., the People’s Republic of China, and other socialist states, were too attacked by foreign actors to establish a direct democracy, so it was only direct in cooperatives, and Lenin stated that reactionaries were powerful enough to justify having a strong state. It’s not in the communist “d.n.a.” though, on the contrary since ‘the final state of socialism’/communism is a stateless society. Et cetera

              Thanks for the reply though, ++

  • Stormy1701@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Violent content is against Reddit rules. So why is the content not being removed and the poster banned?

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Because when a trap kills the rats you do not punish the bait in the rat trap.

    • dumblederp@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It still drives engagement. Same for the subs that have been flooded with AI stories and bot responses. It can be marketed as engagement to advertisers.

        • dumblederp@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I reckon it’s more that they need to be ‘seen’ to be doing something about it, but will nonetheless take the engagement as long as it doesn’t cause a stir. I mean they had jailbait and watchpeopledie as large subreddits for ages… until they started getting flack for it.

  • Photuris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Reddit is now Fascist media. They will suppress talk of armed resistance, if (god forbid) it comes to that.