• easily3667@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Oh we call that a BBC but I’m told it’s confusing to the folks across the other pond (the real pond)

    • southernbrewer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The difference is the order: long black has water on the bottom, espresso on top. Canadiano is the opposite.

      Long black’s better because it preserves the crema better (it doesn’t get murdered by pouring the water on top)

  • cactopuses@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I mean an Americano is just watered down espresso and AFAIK was coined to make fun of the Americans.

    • easily3667@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seems to be right. Not that the making fun of was accurate, but if you have a bunch of toxic men who think espresso puts hair on your chest, seeing folks drink drip coffee is probably embarrassing even though it’s objectively got more caffeine and a completely distinct flavor.

        • easily3667@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Reread what I said

          If it helps, assume I know what I’m talking about. That should steer you straight.

      • cactopuses@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t know if it was so much “Make fun of” as the sentiment was “They can’t handle it” similar to how certain cultures eat relatively spicy food tease those who can’t handle it. I don’t have direct evidence for that part, and my source was a friend of mine who was a foreign exchange student from France who explained it to me as such.

        • easily3667@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Right that’s the toxic masculinity/hair on your chest aspect. Espresso is in general easier on your stomach than drip and it’s certainly easier to drink (worst case it’s a shot). So even though the driver was toxic masculinity, as per usual that toxicity wasn’t even valid.

          Ironically in the middle of being toxic the Europeans invented something called an Americano that Americans don’t drink, doesnt have the rich flavors of what it’s making fun of, has less caffeine than what it’s making fun of, and is actually harder to drink (because of the shit flavor) than the thing it waters down. It’s a massive dumb backfire driven by toxic masculinity from the romance states.

      • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Means you had (likely) cruddy coffee that was normalized for you since a young age, probably with loads of sugar and or milk/cream to boot.

        Just the normal cycle for most people tbh.

        The comfort of the known combined with an underdeveloped palette is what makes it attractive to a lot of people

        It often changes and evolves with time as you grow older, kind of like when you try foods that you hated as a kid only to discover they’re really good.

        Granted that only happens if you explore and experiment, otherwise you never really grow out of it

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Pretty snooty outlook on coffee, especially considering that café au lait, cappuccino etc. exist.

          • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Coffee snobs are the most hilarious variety of snob.

            It’s the sincerity of the nonsense that really sets them apart.

          • cactopuses@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Obviously, everyone is entitled to enjoy the drinks they like, but at least in Canada where I am from, Tim Horton’s reigns supreme, and before I started drinking my coffee black I drank their coffee all the time, but as soon as I took all the sugar and cream out of it I realized it was frankly pretty terrible.

            I think that’s what Whitebrow is referring to (not even Tim’s specifically, just lower tier coffees from such chains) I also see Folgers, and Maxwell House get consumed a lot here, and I find those particular brands to be fairly low quality as well.

            A Cappuccino made correctly with espresso is quite delicious, but that’s a very different beverage from brewed coffee with a lot of cream and sugar.

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              A well-made americano tastes great without cream and sugar, too. When Tim Horton makes a bad americano that doesn’t mean that americano is a bad drink, it means that Tim Horton makes a bad product.

              • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Timmies coffee used to be better back in the day, but then they changed suppliers and since then it just tastes like somebody forgot it in the oven for a few hours too many.

          • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I think you missed the point.

            If you never tried cafe au lait, cappuccino and others, you’d never know if you liked them or not and wouldn’t seek them out or bother to experiment with the other drinks.

            Has nothing to do with being snooty, and has everything to do with sticking to the things you know and tried as opposed to going out of your way to try and discover new things.

            Point is some people never go out and explore new flavours at the risk of not liking something.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Freedomlandian here, keep it up. I’m so fucking ashamed of my country. If someone gets butthurt about petty stuff like this, good.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ll back you up: This likely upsets the right (in both senses of the word) people. This and all the upside-down merch. Keep going you glorious-and-upset-yet-polite people north of the border.

      PS: please keep sending maple syrup, and thank you.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        PS: please keep sending maple syrup, and thank you.

        It’ll have a tariff, and if things ever go back to normal and the tariff is removed the price will not go down again

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Except freedom fries was over morons being upset France that didnt invade another country.

      This is people upset over America being an awful country.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    while I support Canada boycotting the US, you have to admit this in particular is “freedom fries” tier patriotism. it was embarrassing then, and it is embarrassing now.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I would agree if this was Mexico doing it as a response to the gulf thing… then it would have made some sense in context.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yes. Please refer to my original comment, once again, clearly in support of boycotting the US in actually meaningful ways. I say this would be more understandable coming from Mexico because then it would be a jab, against the US unilaterally trying to rename the Gulf of Mexico, so it would make sense to rename something named after America(ns) in return.

            “Oh, you did tariffs and threatening annexation, I shall no longer call this coffee Americano” just doesn’t follow logically. And compared to the threat it is the weakest, lamest, most pathetic form of protest imaginable. That’s my point.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              You are being too literal.

              A better analogy is to say that it’s as lame as Freedom Fries, but it being aimed at the country that re-labeled the French Fry, so that makes it ironic and much funnier.

    • Gloomy@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      We changed the nane of a product because you haven’t joined us wilding an unjustified war on brown people

      vs.

      We changed the name of a product because you waged an unjustified trade war against us for no reason, even tough we have been your closest alley.

      Not the same.

      • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        You understand how despite the differences in justification, someone can find both examples cringe, right?

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I didn’t question motivations. I already said I support boycotting the US. this is not a method of protest that does anything. it’s lame and stupid. Americano is not even American, nor is it Canadian. it’s just dumb. it’s like saying you remember watching Canadian Pie as a teen.

    • parrhesia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      If politicians are pushing this particular change, it would be a bit cringe imo but I chuckled when I saw it.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Agreed that it would definitely be much worse, and maybe I wouldn’t have found it as cringe if I hadn’t seen the push for “Freedom Fries” back in the day.

    • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, no. If you didn’t support their pointless wars back then, they would call you a traitor. Fuck me for not wanting my friends to die.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t understand what this has to do with anything I said.

        • callouscomic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          The “freedom fries” 20 years ago occurred because France did not want to support our stupid middle eastern wars. That spawned the stupid movement to stop calling them French fries. If you were not pro-war in the US in the early 2000’s, a lot of people would suggest you were unpatriotic.

          That is why they said. Because you brought it up.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            I know what Freedom Fries is. That’s why I brought it up. I don’t understand how that’s relevant to my comment that calling Americano Canadiano is dumb.

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Except back then the US was the aggressor, and now the US is the aggressor. I wouldn’t equivocate “you don’t want to blindly follow me into a pointless war” to “you’re targeting me in a trade war”

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        My point is that neither name change actually sends either message. They’re both weak and pointless, literally inconsequential and completely self contained. Imagine the French being … hurt? annoyed? … that some fuckwits on the other side of the world don’t call fries French Fries… as if they gave a shit before. Same here.

  • CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s funny and the Americans being salty about this one, when their country is becoming more and more fascist every day, are even funnier. Get mad about real important things, not this 😂

    • madjo@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Those Americans need to look in a mirror first, with their “freedom fries”, because France decided not to back them in their needless war in Iraq.

      • TheWilliamist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        The last bit of this song always takes with me whenever I hear that phrase…

        Freedom fries and burns and scars Liberator goes too far Freedom fries and screams and yells The promised land is a promised hell — Robert Plant from the album Mighty Rearranger

  • socialjusticewizard@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Writing as a fan of the americano, I think we should just call it what it is. After all, what’s more american than taking something good and watering it down?

    Alternatively we could call it the italiano since that’s where it originated. Or “café à l’eau” perhaps, what’s more Canadian than randomly adding french. Calling it “canadiano” feels too “freedom fries” to me.

    • Tenkard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      “Canadese” is “Canadian” in italian, so that would also change compared to Americano (American in Italian)

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caffè_americano#Origin

      That said, why not Canadiano. Sometimes you want more and a litttle hydration in there. It’s hard to sip an espresso for more than a couple of minutes.

      Agree it feels kind of “freedom fries”-ey but remember that freedom fries were a US republiQan idiocy in a pathetic attempt to mock the French for being too smart to get balls-deep in the Iraq II war. No one but complete koolaid-drinking Qanuts say ‘freedom fries’ now because (a) the French were correct anyway and (b) fries are Belgian.

      In that sense, this is probably better and has a chance of sticking.

      • BookSnob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Because a Canadiano is a much stronger, beefed-up caffeinated beverage — coffee with two shots of espresso. Let’s just call an Americano what is is — snowflake fuel.

      • socialjusticewizard@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s not the same situation as freedom fries at all, but it has the same sort of cringe feel to me. Just like french fries, the americano isn’t really american. We’re not ‘sticking it’ to anyone here, so it rubs me the wrong way a little. I hardly have a strong opinion on it though.