In light of Mozilla’s recent policy changes, we no longer feel assured that Firefox aligns with our commitment to protect your privacy. This prompted us to revisit the choice of default web browser in Zorin OS 17.3.
I feel like if they were gonna go chromium, they should have gone with Vivaldi. It may not be open source but it’s not doing a crypto scam. Waterfox would have also been a good choice, probably better because it’s Gecko.
I don’t know the details, but I hope they will at least remove the VPN and crypto wallet integrations from the default installed version.
Boo
That’s a clown makeup moment for Zorin OS
I have ff installed but uses librewolf for most uses. Should I be worried if ff is in my system? Somebody please explain.
I think we’re pretty far from that being a problem
Thank you. Was out of the loop with ff for a while.
No
Recent firefox policy change is controversial, but how brave is better?
“We don’t like the proposed new Coke recipe, so we’re switching to drinking raw undiluted sewage instead”.
A bad move. But again i hate that many distros have a default browser and they don’t let you choose.
Seems like a strange choice. If anything i would’ve expected them to just use a firefox fork or something.
Zen is literally the best browser around right now, I do understand the UI isn’t for everybody but if you vibe with it, it rocks
How’s the ad blocking or add-ons? Last I looked there was none.
Zen is based on Firefox, it supports 100% of firefox addons, as well as supporting its own community mods system for changing the browser itself
Maybe this was not supposed to have been posted until April fool’s day. Silly Zorin was too early for the joke.
“Mozilla has a bit been shady lately, so we are making the difficult decision to change our default browser to something significantly more shady. We are confident our users will feel safer knowing their data is in even worse hands than before"
🤡
I’m actually not familiar with this distro. But if I installed a Linux distro, and it had brave installed. I would immediately switch.
Brave is a fairly recent outlier, and while it isn’t quite proprietary, it stinks a fair bit of something capitalist/crypto.
deleted by creator
“we replaced the browser with ad ware, that we even admit we had to ship settings to minimise its malware effect”
one of the worst distros ever so I guess this is pretty obvious choice and telling to some.
Define worst? It does what it says, it’s an easy stable distro for windows refugees. Slow updates doesn’t make something bad
the everyday linux distro that is famous for asking people for money for their pro version, cause they know most of the userbase is coming from windows and doesnt know that everything is free?
They don’t force you to buy anything. Almost all distros have a donation button on their site/git.
Nothing wrong with supporting projects you adore.
deleted by creator
Once again like Zorin, it isn’t required to use the base version. Projects take time and effort, support is optional. Debian also has a donation page gonna distrohop now too?
deleted by creator
What does zorin lock behind the pro version? Some themes that you could make yourself if you wanted. And they package some apps that you could manualy download. What updates are you refering to?
deleted by creator
I am not a Zorin OS fanboy or anything, but honestly I don’t see anything scummy about requiring payment from the user to get access to certain features of the product. It’s just shareware. It’s their product FOSS or not. I think they make it clear about what you get for free and what you don’t. If you don’t like that you don’t have to use their product and you can use an alternative instead. It’s not like they were a monopoly in the world of Linux distros and you have no other option. I see nothing scummy about this. It would be scummy if they would do some kind of false advertising (adverties features you actually don’t get or adverties features in a misleading way) or if they started moving features from the free to the pro version that used to be free, because some people may have relyed on these features.
Can you elaborate? Because to me this feels like saying that the local grocery shop is scummy because it wants people to pay instead of relying on donations. If the whole OS was paid like RedHat Linux is than it would be OK or you consider that to be also a case of taking advantage of users who don’t know any better.
Nah people just frame it as if you need to buy it, while that’s not true. No I’m not defending scummy practices, I’m just pro supporting software that you enjoy. That people like you can’t handle others opinions and immediately resort to calling it “fanboy or useful idiot.” The world doesn’t need to be a copy pasta of opinions
