erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agogender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneexternal-linkmessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1805arrow-down112
arrow-up1793arrow-down1external-linkgender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square53fedilink
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·2 days agoMake the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squareBorgDrone@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 hours agoOr just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agobut could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoThat’s more or less what it historically was
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
but could female humans be called femaleman?
That’s more or less what it historically was